False One-Year Rule Used to Expel Disabled Veteran Student

### Incident 23 (Row 24): False Official Reason for Dismissal (One-Year Rule Misapplication)

* **AAUP Redbook Review (C):** The final dismissal document cites a rule applying to students entering with a Master’s degree. Mr. Clark entered with a BS. Applying a false/inapplicable administrative rule to justify expulsion is arbitrary, capricious, and a violation of the student’s right to transparent academic evaluation.

* **ADA Review (D):** Using a pretextual, factually false administrative rule to terminate a disabled student after denying them accommodations is a clear-cut case of disability discrimination under Title II.

* **Title IX / VII Review (E):** Pretextual firing/expulsion (using a demonstrably false reason to hide discriminatory intent) is a primary indicator of illegal discrimination under Title VII/IX frameworks.

* **Veteran / VEVRAA Review (F):** Fabricating grounds for dismissal to remove a disabled veteran from the university violates the affirmative action and non-discrimination mandates of VEVRAA.