### Incident 4 (Row 5): Advisor Approval of Topic but Total Neglect (“Not until you pass PhD exams”)
* **AAUP Redbook Review (C):** The formal grievance document (`/2001-7-15-grievance-letter-to-the-dean-of-the-graduate-school/`) corroborates severe academic neglect. The AAUP Joint Statement (Section IV.A) states students have the right to protection against prejudiced or capricious academic evaluation and neglect. Denying research feedback to a Master’s student for 21 credit hours is a clear breach of professional faculty ethics.
* **ADA Review (D):** 28 CFR § 35.130(b)(1)(ii) prohibits public entities from affording a qualified individual with a disability an opportunity to participate in or benefit from aids, benefits, or services that is not equal to that afforded to others. Refusing baseline academic guidance denies equal access to the educational program.
* **Title IX / VII Review (E):** The intentional withholding of academic support constitutes disparate treatment. In a hostile environment framework, this neglect is a pervasive tactic used to isolate and set up a protected-class student for academic failure.
* **Veteran / VEVRAA Review (F):** Neglecting a disabled Vietnam veteran student contradicts federal mandates requiring universities receiving federal funds to take affirmative steps to